×

Save

Instagram
Meta says it remains confident of its ‘record of protecting teens online’ [File: Dado Ruvic/Illustration/Reuters]

A judge in New Mexico in the United States has ordered Facebook and Instagram owner Meta to pay $567m and change how its platforms function for young users in the state after finding the company is to blame for harming children’s mental health.

Thursday’s ruling came in the second phase of a landmark trial against the social media giant, with jurors in March finding that Meta had violated the state’s consumer protection law by misrepresenting the safety of Facebook and Instagram for young users. The jury ordered the company to pay $375 million in damages earlier this year.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 items

end of list

After this latest ruling, Judge Bryan Biedscheid said the bulk of the money, $420m, will be used for treatment services for young people. The rest will go towards awareness and prevention, screening services and other costs over the next five years.

Prosecutors had asked the judge to impose fundamental changes at Meta aimed at reining in addictive features, improving age verification and preventing child sexual exploitation through default privacy settings and closer oversight.

The decision means the look of Meta’s platforms could change. The judge ordered Facebook and Instagram to build banner and informational screens to clearly explain their protection features, best practices and tools to address inappropriate comments, for example, and display them regularly.

Those changes and an educational campaign in New Mexico would be subject to review by the state.

Meta said it will appeal the ruling and that it has been working to identify and remove harmful content from its platforms.

Advertisement

“We remain confident in our record of protecting teens online and will continue to defend ourselves against claims that misrepresent the facts,” the company said in a statement.

The judge had heard three weeks of testimony during the second trial over the lawsuit, which did not involve a jury. It focused solely on whether Meta’s platforms created a “public nuisance” under New Mexico law.

The case is being closely watched across the US as states, municipalities and school districts  pursue similar claims seeking to force changes at the industry level.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Author

Related Posts

Bashar al-Assad, Atef Najib sentenced to death in landmark Syria trial

Save Click here to share on social media share-nodes Share facebookxwhatsapp-strokecopylink googleAdd Al Jazeera on Googleinfo Bashar al-Assad and Atef Najib [AFP...

Read out all

Indonesian officials race to contain wildfires as dozens of schools shut

ListenListen (3 mins) Save Click here to share on social media share-nodes Share facebookxwhatsapp-strokecopylink googleAdd Al Jazeera on Googleinfo Firefighters attempt to...

Read out all

What is the US spending all their war money on?

Why is the US Pentagon asking for more money for the war on Iran?

Read out all

Iran threat prompted secret Trump flight from Turkiye: Reports

ListenListen (2 mins) Save Click here to share on social media share-nodes Share facebookxwhatsapp-strokecopylink googleAdd Al Jazeera on Googleinfo US President Donald...

Read out all

Ukraine’s 40-day campaign has not brought the war closer to an end

By Leonid Ragozin Leonid Ragozin is a freelance journalist based in Riga. Published On 11 Aug 202611 Aug 2026 ListenListen (6 mins)...

Read out all

Trump sends conflicting signals on Iran strategy

Trump sends conflicting signals on Iran strategy

Read out all